|
Graft copolymerization of acrylonitrile onto
chitosan initiated by potassium diperiodatonickelate (IV)
Liu Yinghai, Liu
Zhenghao, Zhang Yanzhe, Deng Kuilin
(College of Chemistry & Environmental Science, Hebei University, Baoding 071002,
China)
Received Dec. 30, 2001;
Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
Abstracts A novel redox system, potassium
diperiodatonickelate [Ni (IV)]- chitosan, was employed to initiate the graft
copolymerization of acrylonitrile (AN) onto chitosan. The effects of such reaction
variables as monomer concentration, initiator concentration and temperature on the graft
copolymerization were investigated. Ni (IV)- chitosan system is found to be an efficient
redox initiator for this graft copolymerization. A two-step single electron transfer
mechanism is proposed to explain the formation of radicals and the initiation. The grafted
copolymers were identified by Fourier transfer infrared spectroscopy (IR) and X- ray
diffraction diagrams. The thermal stability of chitosan and chitosan- g- PAN was studied
by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).
1 INTRODUCTION
The basic theoretical research and application on supernormal valence transition- metal
attract more and more attention in chemical fields nowadays. In resent years, some
achievements have been obtained on vinyl monomer polymerization and graft copolymerization
initiated by supernormal valence transition- metal, such as Mn (VII), Cr (VI), V (V), Ag
(III), Cu (III) [ 1-4] etc. But there are few reports on graft copolymerization
of vinyl monomer onto chitosan using potassium diperiodatonickelate [Ni (IV)] redox system
as initiator. Normally, it is believed that the mechanism of oxidation by Ni (IV) is a
two- electron- transfer process without radicals, and Ni (IV) cannot initiate
polymerization of vinyl monomer[5-9] . However, under our experimental
conditions, the results show that radical polymerization of some monomers can be initiated
by Ni (IV) redox system[10- 11] . So, the two- step single electron transfer
mechanism is proposed to explain the generation of radicals and the initiation.
Chitosan, obtained from chitin poly- b - (1, 4)- N-acetyl- D- glucosamine through deacetylation using
strong aqueous alkali solution, is a more versatile form of this polysaccharide, which is
the second most abundant natural polymer on earth after cellulose. Grafting various
monomers onto its backbone is a promising method for the preparation of new materials,
which have the potential and multiple applications due to their improved chemical and
physical properties. Many grafting copolymers of chitosan and vinyl monomers were
synthesized and evaluated as flocculant, paper strengthener, drug-releaser and so on [12-17].
In this paper, Ni (IV) was employed as an oxidant and chitosan as a
reductant to make up the redox system to initiate the grafting polymerization of
acrylonitrile (AN) on chitosan backbone. The combined effects of the principal reaction
variables on the copolymerization were investigated and the structures and properties of
the grafted products were characterized by Fourier transfer infrared spectroscopy (IR),
thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and X-ray diffraction. Under the experimental conditions,
it is expected that graft copolymer with high graft efficiency and grafting percentage
using Ni (IV)- chitosan system as initiator could be obtained. Then, a two-step single
electron transfer mechanism is proposed to explain the generation of radicals and the
initiation. The compatibility of
chitosan and PAN, that is poor naturally, is increased and the graft copolymer is expected
to be used as high absorbent resin.
2 EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Materials
The sample of pure chitosan was obtained as a gift from Yuhuan County Chemical Plant,
Zhejiang Province. Its degree of deacetylation is >82% and the molecular weight 2.0×105 -3.0×105. According to the publication[18],
chitosan was ground to be powders (>140mesh) from flats and dried under vacuum at room
temperature. Acrylonitrile (AN) from Beijing Yili Company was distilled and dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate. Ni (IV) was synthesized and measured according to the reported
procedure[19] . Acrylonitrile and Ni (IV) solution were placed in the
refrigerator during the experiment. The other reagents and solvents (analytical grade)
were used without any further purification.
2.2 Graft copolymerization and treatment of copolymer
Graft copolymerization was carried out in a 50mL four-necked flask equipped with
thermometer, condenser, stirrer and gas inlet. In a typical reaction, 0.3 g chitosan was
added with constant stirring under nitrogen. The required amount of monomer was added,
followed by Ni (IV) aqueous solution and the total volume was made up to 20 ml with
distilled water. The graft copolymerization was performed on the conditions of different
temperature, monomer concentration, and initiator concentration. After completion of
reaction, the reactant was cooled and neutralized by aqueous hydrochloric acid solution.
It was poured into ethanol and the precipitated material was filtered through a weighed
sintered glass funnel and washed over several times with ethanol. Then the crude graft
copolymer was dried to a constant weight under vacuum at 60ºC. The homopolymer was
removed from the crude graft copolymer by extraction with THF for 48 hours. The final
graft copolymer was dried at 60ºC to a constant weight under vacuum.
2.3 Measurements
The graft copolymer chitosan- g- PAN was
characterized by IR analysis using an FTS- 40 spectrophotometer in the potassium bromide
medium. X- ray diffraction of the graft copolymer was carried out with Yaa 900 X- ray
diffraction. The TGA of chitosan (4.3 mg) and the copolymers (4.22 mg) were carried out on
a Shimadzu apparatus DGC-40 DTA-TG in atmospheric oxygen at a heating rate of 10ºC/min.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The grafting parameters, grafting percentage (G %),
and efficiency percentage (E %), and the total conversion (C %) were defined and
calculated as follows:
G % = (weight of PAN grafted/ weight of chitosan)×100 %
E % = (weight of PAN grafted/ total weight of PAN) ×100 %
C % = (total weight of PAN/ weight of AN charged) ×100 %
3.1 Effect of initiator concentration
When other reaction situations were kept unchanged, the effect of Ni (IV) concentration on
the extent of graft parameters is shown in Figure 1. The concentration of Ni (IV) effects
E % little, whereas the parameters G % and C % show the tendency of increasing first with
the increase of Ni (IV) concentration. This is because Ni (IV) attacks on the
characteristic group (- NH2) of chitosan backbone directly and increasing
macroradicals could be originated to initiate the graft copolymerization of chitosan and
AN. As a result, G % and C% augment. However, an excess of the Ni (IV) concentration may
accelerate the reaction of Ni (IV) and radical which terminates the chain propagating
reaction. At the same time, the chance of chain transfer reaction to monomer is enhanced.
All these can cause the decrease of grafting parameters consequently.
3.2 Effect of the ratio of monomer/chitosan
By studying the influence of the ratio of AN/chitosan on the
graft yields, as shown in Figure 2, it is found that the grafting parameters reach a
maximum when AN/chitosan is added up to 5.3 and then fall gradually. Because of the
limited solubility of AN in the reaction medium, when the ratio of AN / chitosan is lower,
the interaction between chitosan and AN is little so that both C % and G % is lower too.
After the concentration of AN dissolved in water reaches saturation, the parameters reach
maximum. When the ratio of AN/chitosan exceeds 5.3, the increase of AN volume results in
the volume of water decline in the case the total volume keeps 20mL. Therefore, the amount
of AN dissolved in water phase decreases and the concentration of Ni (IV) goes up, as
explained above, which leads to the grafting parameters decrease finally.

Fig.1 Effect of [Ni (IV)] on graft
parameters
chitosan: 0.3 g; AN: 2.0 mL; 32ºC; 2 h.

Fig.2 Effect of
AN/Chitosan on graft parameters
chitosan: 0.3 g; [Ni (IV)]: 2.25×10-3 M; 32ºC; 2 h.
3.3 Effect of the temperature
At the fixed concentration of AN, Ni (IV) and the amount of chitosan, the relationship
between temperature and the grafting parameters has been investigated and is shown in
Figure 3. Both C % and G % increase at first and then decrease rapidly. When the
temperature of the reaction is lower, the grafting parameters increase with the increasing
temperature. Whereas the grafting parameters level off when the temperature exceeds 32ºC,
which may be due to two factors mainly. On one hand, the chain transfer reaction speeds
up. On the other hand, because the reaction is carried out in alkali medium, the
hydrolysis of monomer is accelerated at higher temperature, which make the
homopolymerization more easily [11]. As a result, the grafting parameters
decrease sharply. The optimum temperature for maximum grafting is 32ºC.

Fig.3 Effect of temperature on
graft parameters
chitosan: 0.3 g; AN: 2.0 mL; [Ni (IV)]: 2.25×10-3 M; 2
h.

Fig.4 IR spectra. of chitosan (A)
and chitosan-g-PAN (B).
3.4 IR Spectroscopy
The grafting was confirmed by comparing the IR spectra of chitosan with that of the
grafted product. The results obtained are shown in Figure 4. The main difference observed
is the presence of the intense absorption band at 2240cm-1 in the IR spectra of
the graft copolymer, which corresponds to the stretching frequency of nitrile groups (-
CN) of PAN chains. Moreover, the N- H zigzag vibration bands of the graft copolymer at
1660cm-1 (I), 1560cm-1 (II) compared with that of pure chitosan display the different
characteristics obviously. So, it can be concluded that chitosan and AN are able to
produce the graft copolymer with Ni (IV) as the initiator. In addition, owing to the
results above, it could be proposed that Ni (IV) may react with amino group in chitosan to
originate macroradicals first and then initiate AN grafting polymerization.

Fig.5
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of pure chitosan (A) and the grafted copolymer (B)
3.5 Thermal analysis
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of pure chitosan and the
grafted copolymer is shown in Figure 5. It is found obvious difference between them. The
TGA of chitosan (A) shows a weight loss in two stages. The first stage ranges between 20ºC and 107ºC and shows about 13.08 % loss in weight.
This may be corresponding to the loss of adsorbed and bound water. The second stage of
weight loss starts at 197ºC and that continues up to 395ºC during which there was 40.55
% of weight loss due to the degradation of chitosan. Whereas the TGA of the grafted
product (B) is different from it. It is observed the latter has three stages of distinct
weight loss between 20ºC and 620ºC. The first stage ranges between 20ºC and 107ºC with
6.664 % of the adsorbed and bound water weight loss. The second stage of weight loss
starts at188ºC and that continues up to 350ºC during which there was 23.69 % of weight
loss due to the degradation of ungrafted chitosan. There is 64.42% weight loss in the
third stage from 350ºC to 620ºC that contributes to
the decomposition of chitosan- g- PAN. So, it is evident that grafting acrylonitrile onto
chitosan could enhance the stability of pure chitosan at higher temperature.
3.6 X- ray
diffraction diagrams
The X- ray diffraction spectra of pure chitosan and chitosan- g- PAN were measured, which
were shown in Figure 6. It is obvious that the X- ray diffraction spectra of the grafted
chitosan increases one more peak than that of pure chitosan. One peak corresponds to the
decreased crystallinity of pure chitosan, and the other corresponds to the crystallinity
of grafted PAN on chitosan backbone. By calculation, it can be obtained that the
crystallinity of chitosan is 0.3199 when the integrated angle range 2 q is between 18.160° and 23.560° and
that of chitosan- g- PAN is 0.2816 when 2q is between 15.520° and 23.560° . The crystallinity of the graft
copolymer decreased obviously compared with chitosan due to the existence of PAN chain,
which can destroy a part of crystal region of pure chitosan.

Fig.6 The X- ray diffraction spectra of pure chitosan (A) and chitosan- g- PAN
(B).
3.7 Solubility test
The solubility test of chitosan-g-PMA is carried out also. The grafted products are
insoluble in solvents for either homopolymer. However, the graft copolymers swell in many
solvents tested, such as 1% acetic acid solution, THF etc.
3.8 The
initiation mechanism of grafting reaction
IR Spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X- ray diffraction diagrams and
solubility test all illustrate that AN has been grafted onto chitosan. It is verified once
more that the process Ni (IV) -> Ni (II) belongs to the two- step single electron
transfer mechanism [11]. The IR spectrum above has revealed that the N- H
zigzag vibration bands of the graft copolymer at 1660cm-1(I), 1560cm-1(II) compared with
that of pure chitosan display the different characteristics obviously. So, it could be
proposed that Ni (IV) may react with amino group in chitosan to originate macroradicals
first and then initiate AN grafting polymerization. The initiation mechanism, referencing
to the related papers [11,20], may be shown as follows:



and again

etc.
4 CONCLUSION
The feasibility of grafting acrylonitrile
onto chitosan by using Ni (IV) - chitosan as the redox initiator has been demonstrated by
this work. The grafted products can enhance the stability of pure chitosan at higher
temperature and are insoluble in solvents for either homopolymer. However, the graft
copolymers swell in many solvents tested, such as 1% acetic acid solution, THF etc. The
crystallinity of the graft copolymer decreased obviously compared with chitosan due to the
existence of PAN. The compatibility of chitosan and PAN, that is poor naturally, is
increased by means of the graft copolymerization and the graft copolymer is expected to be
high absorbent resin after being hydrolyzed.
Under the experimental conditions, graft copolymer with high graft
efficiency and grafting percentage using Ni (IV)- chitosan system as initiator has been
obtained. Ni (IV)- chitosan is concluded to be an efficient redox initiator for the graft
copolymerization. The two- step single electron transfer mechanism proposed in redox
process is a modification to traditional mechanism. Moreover, because the activation
energy of the reaction employing Ni (IV)- chitosan as initiator is low so that the graft
copolymerization is able to be carried out at a mild temperature 32ºC, which is superior to other initiators. So, Ni
(IV)- chitosan as initiator is thought to be practical and has a good prospect.
REFERENCES
[1] Gao Jianping, Tian Ruchuan, Chang Liming. Chin. J. Polym. Sci., 1996, 14 (2): 163-171.
[2] Gao Jianping, Yu Jiugao, Wang Wei et al. J. Macromol. Sci., Pure Appl. Chem.,
1998, A 35 (3): 483-494.
[3] Liu Yinghai, Liu Weihong, Yang Jiming et al. J. Molecular Sci., 1996, 12 (2): 190-194.
[4] Liu Yinghai, Song Xingru, Shi Hongmei. Chem. J. Chinese Univ., 1990, 11 (3): 328-330.
[5] Murthy C P, Sethuram B, Rao T. Navaneeth. Z. Phys. Chem. (Leipzig) 1986, 267 (6):
1212- 1218.
[6] M Afzal Ali Siddiqui, C Sudheer Kumar, U Chanddraiah Sushama Kandlikar. Indian J.
Chem., 1991, 30 (A): 849-854.
[7] G H Hugar, S T Nandibewoor. Indian J. Chem. 1993, 32A: 1056-1059.
[8] Wang A Z, Li F M, Ding T H. Chem. Res. Chinese Univ., 1992, 8 (4): 432?438.
[9] Li Z T, Wang F L, Wang A Z. Int. J. Chem. Kinetics, 1992, 24: 933-941.
[10] Shang Y J, Liu Y H, Deng K L. J. Hebei Univ., 1999, 19 (4): 356.
[11] Liu Y H, Shang Y J, Li W P et al. Acta Polymerica Sinica, 2000, (2): 235.
[12] Shantha K L, Bala Udaya, Rao K Panduranga. Eur. Polym. J., 1995, 31 (4):
377-382.
[13] Kim Kyoung Ho, Kim Kong Soo, Kim Yong Beom. Pollimo, 1987, 11 (30): 261-267.
[14] Ouchi Tatsuro, Banba Toshio. J.Macromol. Sci., Chem., 1991, A 28 (10): 959.
[15] Kim Chun Ho, Jo Sung-Kwan. Kong op Kwahak, 1995, 6 (2): 267.
[16] Kang Doo Whan, Choi Hoo Rak, Kweon Dong Keon. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1999, 73 (4):
469-476.
[17] Chern Chorng-Shyan, Lee Cheng-Kang. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 1999, 37
(10): 1489.
[18] Tang X R, Cao Y H, Wang XY, et al. Natural Product R. & D., 1997, 9 (1): 86-91.
[19] Crouthamel C E, Meek H V, Martin D S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1949, 71: 3031.
[20] Liu Y H, Li W P, Deng K L et al. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2001, 82 (11): 2636-2640.
|